|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills GM (Commish) on Mar 27, 2014 15:31:17 GMT
Saints Send
MJD - (RB-?) - $6.10
2014 pick 1.06 - $6.95
Bills Send
2014 pick 2.02
2014 pick 3.01
This is clearly another ploy buy the Saints to get more cap. I have been gunning for another 1st and 1.06 is the sweet spot for me. I really didn't want to see 2.02 go as I feel it is practically a 1st in its own right, but thats fine. I will have some work ahead of me to deal with cap issues, but I think I will be able to manage. Good Dealing Saints.
|
|
mike
New Member
Posts: 23 
|
Post by mike on Mar 27, 2014 16:09:09 GMT
Disapprove (0-1) To me it's clear there is not fair compensation in this trade. There are other players and picks that the Saints could move to gain cap. The current 6.10 and 6.95 are modest numbers compared to the values of other players on his team. MJD and 1.06 are worth more IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills GM (Commish) on Mar 27, 2014 16:39:53 GMT
Hey Mike in the future please wait to vote until the other team has claimed they approve of the trade, thanks man!
|
|
|
|
Post by piratehooker on Mar 27, 2014 20:07:27 GMT
I approve, Mike you gotta realize that taking on MJD could potentially be a huge thorn in the owners side. 6.1 mil to a guy who may not even be on a team in 2014. And the fact that this will give me 6.1+ 6.95 + (4.4-1.8) (rookie salaries) = 15.65 more in cap to fill out my roster
|
|
|
|
Post by piratehooker on Mar 27, 2014 20:12:00 GMT
Minus another 1.3 for the 3.03 pick so actually 14.35 mil in cap. Correct me if I'm wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by Redskins GM on Mar 27, 2014 20:58:02 GMT
I disaprove also. This is too one sided (0-2)
|
|
|
|
Post by piratehooker on Mar 27, 2014 21:10:44 GMT
It's not one sided at all! I've offered this trade to a bunch of people and they all declined because there cap hit was too much! Open your eyes
|
|
|
|
Post by Redskins GM on Mar 27, 2014 21:26:18 GMT
Whats the point of a DOT seriously if I cant vote on what I think is right. I'm only one vote, maybe your points will convince someone else.
Oh and don't talk to me like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by piratehooker on Mar 27, 2014 21:53:13 GMT
Don't get butthurt, just arguing my point. It was a general comment to everyone who will potentially vote. You have every right to veto, just try to look at it from all angles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Texans GM on Mar 28, 2014 0:21:10 GMT
I approve. (1-2)
|
|
|
|
Post by Vikings GM (Landon) on Mar 28, 2014 0:37:29 GMT
Sorry y'all, I gotta veto this as well. I vetoed the other deal, and I think this is along the same lines.
VETO (1-2.5)
|
|
|
|
Post by Bears GM on Mar 28, 2014 1:52:19 GMT
Approve (2-2.5)
|
|
|
|
Post by rustycolts on Mar 28, 2014 2:48:26 GMT
Even though I hate to see anything that will improve an AFC east team approve 2.5 - 2.5
|
|
|
|
Post by titansgm on Mar 28, 2014 3:51:32 GMT
GM Approve (3-2.5)
|
|
|
|
Post by gremlin on Mar 28, 2014 4:00:03 GMT
veto (3-3)
1.06 in this years draft will yield a quality player with high upside.
|
|
