|
Post by jaguarsgm on Mar 26, 2014 0:03:07 GMT
Jaguars give up. 2014 r1.03
Bears give up 2014 r1.27 2014 r4 2014 r5 2015r4
Jags wants to free up some cap space. And approve.
|
|
|
Post by Redskins GM on Mar 26, 2014 1:41:54 GMT
Approve. (1.5-0)
|
|
|
Post by Bears GM on Mar 26, 2014 1:56:56 GMT
Bears GM approves (2-0)
|
|
|
Post by Texans GM on Mar 26, 2014 13:49:29 GMT
Guys, GM's involved in a trade do not get a vote on the approval process. Bears your vote does not count, all that is needed is your approval of the trade before other GM's cast their vote. Redskins get a half vote since they are not on DOT.
I approve on this trade. I do believe the bears are getting the better end of the deal, but I understand that Jags need to make cap space.
The vote stands right now at (1.5-0)
|
|
|
Post by piratehooker on Mar 26, 2014 14:33:57 GMT
Approve. 2.5-0
|
|
|
Post by Bears GM on Mar 26, 2014 14:50:09 GMT
Thanks Texans -- I was under the impression that the .5s from previous trades were from the GMs involved in the deal. Now I know better for the future.
|
|
mike
New Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by mike on Mar 26, 2014 14:55:46 GMT
Approve 3.5
|
|
|
Post by Vikings GM (Landon) on Mar 26, 2014 15:16:29 GMT
VETO.. (3.5-0.5) That's a terrible return for a top 5 pick.......
|
|
|
Post by rustycolts on Mar 26, 2014 16:35:29 GMT
approve. 4 - 0.5
|
|
|
Post by Buffalo Bills GM (Commish) on Mar 26, 2014 20:48:11 GMT
Approve 5-.5
The return isn't that great but there is a cap difference here that makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Redskins GM on Mar 26, 2014 20:51:10 GMT
Hey, I am on the DOT
|
|